USPTO serial 78520245
DESIGNERS MARKETPLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DESIGNERS MARKETPLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Albuquerque, NM
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN LYNN WILDENSTEIN
KEVIN LYNN WILDENSTEIN SOUTHWEST INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SVCS LLC9400 HOLLY AVE BLDG 4HALBUQUERQUE, NM 87122UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Distribution services, namely, wholesale distribution of furniture, interior window shutters, window blinds, window shades, curtain fabric, fabric valences, knitted, mesh-woven mixed fiber, cotton, nylon, polyester, ramie and rayon fabrics, window curtains, poufs, puffs and swags | ACTIVE | Aug 28, 1997 |
| 024 | Curtain fabric; fabric valances; knitted, mesh-woven, mixed fiber, cotton, nylon, polyester, ramie and rayon fabrics; window curtains, poufs, puffs and swags | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |