USPTO serial 78520264
BUY UNION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUY UNION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Staten Island, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper Goods and Printed Matters, namely, address books, label paper, paper labels, engraving plates, addressing machines, adhesive tape dispensers, coin and photograph albums, blank cards and greeting cards, air stones, art etchings, mounts, paper, pictures, prints and reproductions, autograph books, microwave cooking bags, binders, boxes, calendars, printed charts, flip charts, clip boards, mats, wrappers, crayons, credit cards without magnetic coding, crossword puzzles, decals, paper party decorations, desk accessories, desk calendars, desk file trays, desk pads, desk sets, desk stands and holders for pens and pencils and ink, paper emblems, file boxes, cards, folders, paper jackets, pockets for storage of business or personal record; paper flags, folders, printed forms, garbage bags, gift cards, wrapping paper and paper ribbons, grocery bags, paper hats, magazine columns, magnetic boards and paper, masking paper, mat boards, postcards, rulers, plastic sandwich bags, stationery, paper table cloths, napkins, tissues, toilet paper, leaflets, posters and signs. | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING FOR MEN, WOMEN, AND CHILDREN FOR THE FEET, LEGS, TRUNK, NECK, EARS AND HEAD FOR CASUAL, SPORTS, DRESS, EVENING, NIGHT AND SPECIAL EVENTS, NAMELY, INNER SOLES, HEEL INSERTS, FOOTWEAR, ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR, BOOTIES, BOOTS AND CLOGS, SOCKS, ANKLETS, ANKLE GARTERS, PANTS, SHORTS, JEANS, HOSIERY, SKIRTS, WRIST BANDS, BELTS AND MONEY BELTS, GLOVES AND MITTENS, SPORTS GLOVES, NAMELY, SKI GLOVES, BICYCLE GLOVES, AND SNOWBOARD GLOVES, APRONS, BABY BUNTING, BABY CLOTH DIAPERS, BATHING SUITS AND TRUNKS, BEACH WEAR, CLOTH BIBS, BLAZERS, BLOUSES, BODY SUITS, UNDERWEAR AND FOUNDATION GARMENTS, SMOCKS, CARDIGANS, COATS EXCEPT FUR COATS, RAIN WEAR, HALLOWEEN AND MASQUERADE COSTUMES, COVERALLS, DRESSES, DRESSING GOWNS, FISHING VESTS, JACKETS, JERSEYS, JOGGING SUITS, SHIRTS, SUITS, SLEEPWEAR, SHOULDER PADS, NECKWEAR, SCARVES, HEAD AND NECK BANDS, TIES, EARMUFFS, HEAD SCARVES, BANDANAS, SWEAT BANDS, BATHING CAPS, BERETS, BONNETS, HATS AND CAPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | BEVERAGES, NAMELY, MINERAL WATER, DRINKING WATER, FLAVORED DRINKING WATER, PURIFIED WATER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |