USPTO serial 78520355
NATURE'S MOST POWERFUL SUPER-GRAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATURE'S MOST POWERFUL SUPER-GRAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eugene J.A. Gierczak
EUGENE JA GIERCZAK MILLER THOMSON LL TORONTO ONC ONTARIOM5H 3S1STE 2500; 20 QUEEN ST W,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional supplements, meal replacement bars, vitamin and mineral formed and packaged as bars, weight loss products namely diet bars, powdered formulas, women's health products namely vitamins, bowel movement and colonic health products namely preparations in powder, liquid, capsule, gel and tablet form for the treatment of gastroenterological intestine, bowel, stomach and digestive disorders, diet specialty health specialty products namely diet bars, food supplements, in liquid or powdered form of the plant species salvia hispanica, soy protein for use as a nutritional ingredient in various powdered and ready-to-drink beverages, vitamins, food supplements namely anti-oxidants, mineral nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Processed grains namely grains derived from the plant species salvia hispanica; bread, bread and buns, bread crumbs, bread doughs, bread sticks, bread with soy bean, breadcrumbs, food package combinations consisting primarily of bread, crackers and/or cookies, pita bread, rolls of bread, stuffing mixes containing bread, unleavened bread in thin sheets, wholemeal bread, baked goods, tea-based beverages with fruit flavouring, frozen fruit-based beverages, fruit juice bases, breakfast cereals, cereal based snack food, processed cereals, ready to eat cereal derived food bars, alimentary pasta, dried pasta, fresh pasta, pasta, pasta for soups, pasta salad, pasta shells, pasta-wrappings for gyoza | ACTIVE | Nov 14, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |