CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EURO ULTRAV

USPTO serial 78520374

EURO ULTRAV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3379320Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 5, 2008
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with EURO ULTRAV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George L. Pinchak

Transtar Autobody Technologies, Inc.7350 Young DriveCLEVELAND, OH 44146UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001POLYESTER FILLERS FOR APPLICATION TO METAL SURFACES FOR REPAIR PURPOSES PRIOR TO PAINTING, THE POLYESTER FILLERS BEING CURED BY EXPOSURE TO ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT, FOR USE IN THE AUTOMOTIVE, COMMERCIAL VEHICLE AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT INDUSTRIESSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 19, 2007
002PAINT PRIMERS FOR APPLICATION TO UNPAINTED METAL PRIOR TO PAINTING AND CLEARCOAT COATINGS FOR APPLICATION OVER PAINTED METAL FOR PROTECTING PAINTED FINISHES, THE PAINT PRIMERS AND CLEARCOAT COATINGS BEING CURED BY EXPOSURE TO ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT, FOR USE IN THE AUTOMOTIVE, COMMERCIAL VEHICLE AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT INDUSTRIESSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 7, 2018CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jun 13, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 6, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 27, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 4, 2015CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Mar 28, 2013NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 20138.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Mar 26, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 13, 2013ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 19, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 27, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 31, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Oct 26, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 5, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 10, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 21, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 19, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 19, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 19, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 25, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 2005ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Mar 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance