USPTO serial 78521039
TILE PRO SETTING SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TILE PRO SETTING SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey R. Glassman
Mike Humphreys Western States Wholesale1420 S. Bon ViewOntario, CA 91761UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | (Based on Intent to Use) Items and accessories for installation of tile, slate and other flooring materials, namely adhesives for applying floor tiles | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | Decorative spray sealer coatings to prevent deterioration of flooring materials; preservative sealer coatings to prevent deterioration of flooring materials | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2004 |
| 003 | (Based on Intent to Use) Preservative to prevent deterioration of flooring materials, namely grout and title cleaner | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | (Based on Intent to Use) Flooring materials, namely sound control flooring underlayment, sound absorbing flooring underlayment | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Mixtures, namely mortar mix, grout mix with binding properties for installation of tile, slate and other flooring materials; flooring materials, namely flooring underlayment | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2004 |
| 027 | (Based on Intent to Use) Flooring materials, namely floor coverings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Western States Wholesale, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Western States Wholesale, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named TILE PRO SETTING SYSTEMS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |