USPTO serial 78521158
STEALTH DEFENSE FOR MEDICAL IMPLANTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STEALTH DEFENSE FOR MEDICAL IMPLANTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dennis J. Helms
Dennis J. Helms Flaster/Greenberg P.C.1810 Chapel Avenue WestCherry Hill, NJ 08002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Medical and scientific research; product development consultation regarding high-end surfaces exclusively for medical use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Imed Devices, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CELONOVA BIOSCIENCES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CELONOVA BIOSCIENCES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STEALTH DEFENSE FOR MEDICAL IMPLANTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |