Drawing for PARTYPOKER.COM WORLD'S LARGEST POKER ROOM

USPTO serial 78521170

PARTYPOKER.COM WORLD'S LARGEST POKER ROOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARTYPOKER.COM WORLD'S LARGEST POKER ROOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark V. B. Partridge

MARK V B PARTRIDGE PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606-6631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software distributed via the Internet, namely, downloadable computer games softwareACTIVE—
035Providing affiliate website services for others via the Internet, namely, providing promotion and advertising for online gaming sites operated by othersACTIVE—
041Providing online newsletters in the field of online gaming via the Internet and e-mail; arranging, organizing and conducting entertainment services in the form of online gaming contests and games of chanceACTIVE—
042Computer games software distributed via the Internet, namely, providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer game software; providing affiliate website services for others via the Internet, namely, troubleshooting of global network website software problems of online gaming websites operated by othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 15, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 3, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance