Drawing for AUTOPLUS MAGAZINE

USPTO serial 78521783

AUTOPLUS MAGAZINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTOPLUS MAGAZINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Araceli M. Lerma

ARACELI M LERMA LERMA LAW OFFICES1216 E COMPTON BLVDCOMPTON, CA 90221UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Magazine featuring car advertisingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 17, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Feb 7, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 15, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance