USPTO serial 78521900
FRISKY FRIENDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDGE, KATRINA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRISKY FRIENDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ken Emanuelson
CHARLES M HOSCH STRASBURGER & PRICE LLP901 MAIN ST STE 4400DALLAS, TX 75202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Pet products, namely, saddle racks, tack racks and cat scratching posts | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | Pet products, namely, cat beds, dog beds and pet kennels | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | Pet products, namely, bird feeders, bird houses, cat litter boxes, cat litter box covers, pet food and water bowls, pet food storage containers and cages | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by International Development Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by International Development Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named FRISKY FRIENDS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |