Drawing for COMPREHENSION

USPTO serial 78521969

COMPREHENSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GENOVESE, CARRIE A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPREHENSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Doreen L. Costa, Esq.

Doreen L. Costa, Esq. BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.44TH FLOOR30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10112-4498

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Database management software for use in the business administration field for scheduling, billing, reporting and archiving of radiologic testing and imaging of a patient's demographic, encounter, clinical order, visit information and associated documentsACTIVE
010Computer programs for use in the diagnosis and treatment of patients, namely, database management software containing patient specific image related information for use by healthcare providers for reviewing past medical history and radiologic images and using in the diagnosis and treatment of patientsACTIVE
042Design of computer software, programs, and databases for others that manage patient specific image related information used by healthcare providers for reviewing past medical history and radiologic images for the primary diagnosis and care of patients; and design of computer software for others in the field of business administration, management, scheduling, billing, reporting and archiving of radiologic testing, and imaging of a patients's demographic, encounter, clinical order, visit information and associated documentsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Aug 19, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Aug 19, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Feb 6, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Feb 6, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 21, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 21, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 5, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 9, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 9, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 29, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 7, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 28, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance