USPTO serial 78522104
UNIVERSAL SOLUTIONS O BOTICÁRIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNIVERSAL SOLUTIONS O BOTICÁRIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
SÁO JOSE DOS PINHAIS - PARANÁ, BR
Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
SÁO JOSE DOS PINHAIS - PARANÁ, BR
Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
P. JAY HINES
P JAY HINES BAKER & HOSTETLER LLPWASHINGTON SQ STE 11001050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, PERFUMERY AND PERSONAL HYGIENE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, TOILET WATER, COLOGNE WATER, LAVENDER WATER, TOILET SOAPS, DEODORANT SOAPS, OILS FOR TOILETRY PURPOSES, NON-MEDICATED TOILETRIES, BATH OILS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, COSMETIC OILS, NON-MEDICATED BATH SALTS, PRE-SHAVE AND AFTER-SHAVE GELS, LOTIONS AND CREAMS, BODY AND BEAUTY CARE COSMETICS, BEAUTY MASKS, COSMETIC PENCILS, PRE-MOISTENED COSMETIC WIPES IMPREGNATED WITH COSMETIC LOTIONS, PERFUMERY, HAIR SHAMPOOS AND CONDITIONERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
- Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named UNIVERSAL SOLUTIONS O BOTICÁRIO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |