USPTO serial 78522132
LIGHTS O BOTICÁRIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIGHTS O BOTICÁRIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
SÁO JOSE DOS PINHAIS - PARANÁ, BR
Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
SÁO JOSE DOS PINHAIS - PARANÁ, BR
Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
P. JAY HINES
P JAY HINES BAKER & HOSTETLER LLPWASHINGTON SQ STE 11001050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, PERFUMERY AND PERSONAL HYGIENE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, TOILET WATER, COLOGNE WATER, LAVENDER WATER, TOILET SOAPS, DEODORANT SOAPS, OILS FOR TOILETRY PURPOSES, NON-MEDICATED TOILETRIES, BATH OILS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, COSMETIC OILS, NON-MEDICATED BATH SALTS, PRE-SHAVE AND AFTER-SHAVE GELS, LOTIONS AND CREAMS, BODY AND BEAUTY CARE COSMETICS, BEAUTY MASKS, COSMETIC PENCILS, PRE-MOISTENED COSMETIC WIPES IMPREGNATED WITH COSMETIC LOTIONS, PERFUMERY, HAIR SHAMPOOS AND CONDITIONERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
- Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named LIGHTS O BOTICÁRIO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |