USPTO serial 78522193
FLASH LITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3473651Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 2008
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLASH LITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Jose, CA
San Jose, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel C. Poliak
Daniel C. Poliak Adobe Systems Incorporated801 North 34th StreetLegal DepartmentSeattle, WA 98103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for creating, designing, developing, publishing, viewing, playing, editing, and interacting with rich internet applications, animation, video, sound, graphics, presentations, images, illustrations, modeling, website content, text, motion pictures, and other multimedia content on wireless products, handheld electronic devices, personal digital assistants, mobile devices, cellular telephones, kiosks, television set top boxes, and interactive electronic displays; computer software for the production, management, deployment, and display of data and content on wireless products, handheld electronic devices, personal digital assistants, mobile devices, cellular telephones, kiosks, television set top boxes, and interactive electronic displays; computer software used to design and develop other computer software, applications and interfaces; computer software development tools; web development software; web authoring software; computer software for use in authoring and publishing content for the web and for wireless products, handheld electronic devices, personal digital assistants, mobile devices, cellular telephones, kiosks, television set top boxes, and interactive electronic displays; computer software for enhancing the capabilities of web browser software; user manuals and instructional books sold as a unit therewith and user manuals and instructional books in electronic form | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Adobe Systems Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Adobe Systems Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Macromedia, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Macromedia, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named FLASH LITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 13, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 2, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 31, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |