Drawing for LE BON VIN DE LA NAPA VALLEY

USPTO serial 78522205

LE BON VIN DE LA NAPA VALLEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3276409Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2007
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LE BON VIN DE LA NAPA VALLEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Warren L. Dranit

WARREN L DRANIT SPAULDING MCCULLOUGH & TANSIL LLP3550 ROUND BARN BLVD STE 306SANTA ROSA, CA 95403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDAug 25, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2011C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jan 19, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 12, 2011C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jan 12, 2011ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 3, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 6, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 30, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Apr 16, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 17, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 17, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 12, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 21, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 26, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 9, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
May 31, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance