USPTO serial 78522327
MECCA COSMETICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3756149Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 2, 2010
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MECCA COSMETICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RICHMOND, VIC, AU
Richmond, Victoria, AU
VICTORIA, AU
VICTORIA, AU
SOUTH YARRA, 3141, VIC, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric T. Fingerhut
Eric T. Fingerhut Howrey LLP1299 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.Washington, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, toiletries and personal care products, namely, lotions, butters, creams, balms, moisturizers, waxes, emulsions, cleansers, washes, home fragrance, self-tanners, scrubs and exfoliants for the hands, feet, face, hair and body; nail polishes; nail varnishes; nail care preparations, namely, cuticle creams; cosmetic preparations including lip balms, lip glosses, lip volume maximizers; cosmetic preparations for the shower and bath, namely, body wash | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | Bags, namely, toiletry and cosmetic bags and makeup brush rolls, all sold empty | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Computerized on-line retail store services and mail order services in the field of cosmetics, toiletries and personal care products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 9, 2000 |
| 044 | Beauty care advisory services relating to cosmetics, toiletries, personal care products, hair care products, perfumery, nail polishes, nail varnishes and nail care preparations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 9, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MBIP NOMINEES PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by Mecca Cosmetica Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by COSMETICS CUBED PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by COSMETICS CUBED PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by Mecca Cosmetica Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named MECCA COSMETICA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | ISSR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | PBCO | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - COMM.OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 26, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 29, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2008 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| May 27, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |