USPTO serial 78522459
OPS!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPS!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
SÁO JOSE DOS PINAIS - PARANÁ, BR
Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
P. JAY HINES
BARBARA H LOEWENTHAL GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVE 8TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, PERFUMERY AND PERSONAL HYGIENE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, TOILET WATER, COLOGNE WATER, LAVENDER WATER, TOILET SOAPS, DEODORANT SOAPS, OILS FOR TOILETRY PURPOSES, NON-MEDICATED TOILETRIES, BATH OILS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, COSMETIC OILS, NON-MEDICATED BATH SALTS, PRE-SHAVE AND AFTER-SHAVE GELS, LOTIONS AND CREAMS, BODY AND BEAUTY CARE COSMETICS, BEAUTY MASKS, COSMETIC PENCILS, PRE-MOISTENED COSMETIC WIPES IMPREGNATED WITH COSMETIC LOTIONS, PERFUMERY, HAIR SHAMPOOS AND CONDITIONERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |