USPTO serial 78522464
UNIVERSAL SOLUTIONS O BOTICÁRIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3399440Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 18, 2008
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with UNIVERSAL SOLUTIONS O BOTICÁRIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
SÁO JOSE DOS PINAIS - PARANÁ, BR
Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
SÁO JOSE DOS PINAIS - PARANÁ, BR
Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
SÁO JOSE DOS PINAIS - PARANÁ, BR
Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA S.A.
SAO JOSE DOS PINHAIS, PARANA, BR
Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA S.A.
BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA.
SAO JOSE DOS PINHAIS, PARANA, BR
Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara H. Loewenthal
BARBARA H LOEWENTHAL GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVE 8TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, PERFUMERY AND PERSONAL HYGIENE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, TOILET WATER, COLOGNE WATER, LAVENDER WATER, TOILET SOAPS, DEODORANT SOAPS, OILS FOR TOILETRY PURPOSES, NON-MEDICATED TOILETRIES, BATH OILS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, COSMETIC OILS, NON-MEDICATED BATH SALTS, PRE-SHAVE AND AFTER-SHAVE GELS, LOTIONS AND CREAMS, BODY AND BEAUTY CARE COSMETICS, BEAUTY MASKS, COSMETIC PENCILS, PRE-MOISTENED COSMETIC WIPES IMPREGNATED WITH COSMETIC LOTIONS, PERFUMERY, HAIR SHAMPOOS AND CONDITIONERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
- Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
- Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA
- Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by BOTICA COMERCIAL FARMACEUTICA LTDA.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named UNIVERSAL SOLUTIONS O BOTICÁRIO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |