Drawing for STATISTICAL KANBAN

USPTO serial 78522944

STATISTICAL KANBAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STATISTICAL KANBAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas R. Marsh

THOMAS R MARSH MARSH FISCHMANN & BREYFOGLE LLP3151 S VAUGHN WAY STE #411AURORA, CO 80014UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in engineering, design, implementation and control of manufacturing and inventory management processesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 22, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 22, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 27, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 4, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 4, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 1, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 17, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance