USPTO serial 78523115
EZ·BAKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EZ·BAKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neal E. Friedman
NEAL E FRIEDMAN DAVIS & BUJOLD PLLC500 N COMMERCIAL ST STE 4MANCHESTER, NH 03101-1151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fresh or deep frozen cooked dishes, namely, cooked dishes based on meat, fish, shell fish, poultry or cheese; regional gastronomic specialities, namely, garnished sauerkraut, stew, cooked snails, souffles; food products and preparations based on meat, fish, cold meats or potatoes, namely, croquettes, steak in breadcrumbs, donut, fried, gratins, flat cakes, hash; meat-based pre-prepared dishes; rolls filled with meat, fish and/or poultry; cold meat pastries, namely, meat pastries, slices, meat, fish or poultry pies; fast food products, namely, ham and cheese toasted sandwiches, hotdogs, ham croissants, sausage rolls, slices, sandwiches, and goods related to any or all of the above | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Baking or confectionary products; fresh and frozen bread; milk bread, sweet bread; special and innovative bread varieties; baguettes and long bread; diet and country bread; rolls; uncooked and deep frozen bread; food mix, Viennese bread, Viennese pastries, croissants, turnovers, cakes, biscuits, sweet bread, gingerbread; ;pizzas, cold meat pastries, namely, meat pastries, slices, meat, fish and/or poultry pies, vegetable, cheese and fruit pies; rolls filled with meat, fish and/or poultry; sandwiches; pretzels, appetizer titbits, appetizer titbits in breadcrumbs; biscottes; breadcrumbs; seasoning, condiments, spices; sauces; pasta-based food products, and goods related to any or all of the above | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | On-site, home and/or group catering services; meal preparation; preparation of food specialties; self-service and group catering; catering and hotel services; fast food services,and sevices related to any or all of the above | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |