USPTO serial 78523148
HOUSE OF FIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOUSE OF FIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Apparel, namely caps, hats, rain hats, visors, baseball caps, sweatshirts, sweat pants, shorts, pyjamas, nightshirts, t-shirts, tank tops, jerseys, bathing trunks and suits, bikinis, barbecue gilling gloves; outerwear, namely jackets, vest, raincoats, parkas; denim wear, namely overalls; hats, coats, jackets and pants worn by chefs; accessories, namely back packs, duffel bags, sports bags, canvas tore bags, knapsacks; jewellery; housewares and hojme furnishings, namely, coffee mugs, drinking glasses, water bottles, barbecue cooking utensils; barbecue cooking grills; printed matter, namely cookbooks; food, namely cooking sauces, marinades and rubs; Restaurant and bar services; conducting cooking classes | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 025 | Apparel, namely caps, hats, rain hats, visors, baseball caps, sweatshirts, sweat pants, shorts, pyjamas, nightshirts, t-shirts, tank tops, jerseys, bathing trunks and suits, bikinis, barbecue gilling gloves; outerwear, namely jackets, vest, raincoats, parkas; denim wear, namely overalls; hats, coats, jackets and pants worn by chefs; accessories, namely back packs, duffel bags, sports bags, canvas tore bags, knapsacks; jewellery; housewares and hojme furnishings, namely, coffee mugs, drinking glasses, water bottles, barbecue cooking utensils; barbecue cooking grills; printed matter, namely cookbooks; food, namely cooking sauces, marinades and rubs; Restaurant and bar services; conducting cooking classes | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Apparel, namely caps, hats, rain hats, visors, baseball caps, sweatshirts, sweat pants, shorts, pyjamas, nightshirts, t-shirts, tank tops, jerseys, bathing trunks and suits, bikinis, barbecue gilling gloves; outerwear, namely jackets, vest, raincoats, parkas; denim wear, namely overalls; hats, coats, jackets and pants worn by chefs; accessories, namely back packs, duffel bags, sports bags, canvas tore bags, knapsacks; jewellery; housewares and hojme furnishings, namely, coffee mugs, drinking glasses, water bottles, barbecue cooking utensils; barbecue cooking grills; printed matter, namely cookbooks; food, namely cooking sauces, marinades and rubs; Restaurant and bar services; conducting cooking classes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |