CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for HRX

USPTO serial 78523156

HRX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLLIER, DAVID E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HRX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric Karich

ERIC KARICH LAW OFFICES OF ERIC KARICH2807 ST MARK DRMANSFIELD, TX 76063-2835UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Skin care treatment products, namely, facial day cream, night cream, anti-wrinkle cream, non-medicated skin serum, facial masks, skin cleanser, facial scrubs, skin cream, facial toner lotion, eye-wrinkle cream, facial cleanser, exfoliator cream, moisturizers for the eyes, hands, body and face; cosmetics, namely, lip gloss, lip balm, lip enhancing serum, foundation cover, eye shadow; and bath products, namely, hand and body moisturizers, bath and shower gels, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, tanning lotion, and bath oil.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 29, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 22, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Jul 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance