CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for B.A.T.-3

USPTO serial 78523165

B.A.T.-3

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3131972Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 22, 2006
Examiner
JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with B.A.T.-3?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $850

Trademark Monitoring(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3rd Ave, 10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Industrial oil and greases; all purpose lubricants and automotive lubricants; non-chemical gasoline and motor oil additives for use in internal combustion engines and breaking fluids; hydraulic oilsACTIVEJul 29, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 4, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 3, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 30, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2012NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED—
Jun 18, 20128.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jun 12, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 29, 2012ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 30, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2006MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2006REINREINSTATED—
Mar 6, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2006UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance