Drawing for CANDLELIT DINNER

USPTO serial 78524541

CANDLELIT DINNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANDLELIT DINNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank J. Colucci

FRANK J COLUCCI COLUCCI & UMANS101 E 52ND STNEW YORK, NY 10022-6000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Personal care products, namely, sachets, bubble bath, shower gel, body lotion, body scrub, massage oil, eau de parfum, body mist, body powder and shimmering body powder sold only in Victoria's Secret retail stores,catalog and websiteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2007UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Sep 28, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 28, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 27, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 18, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 2, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 24, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 24, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance