USPTO serial 78524608
EQUITY RESIDENCE CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EQUITY RESIDENCE CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant R. Clayton
GRANT R CLAYTON CLAYTON HOWARTH & CANNON PCPO BOX 1909SANDY, UT 84091-1909UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management services for others in the field of resort recreation clubs, vacation clubs, undivided deed interest clubs, private habitat clubs, right to use clubs, and long term leasing of real property | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2007 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |