USPTO serial 78524615
EQUITY RESIDENCE CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EQUITY RESIDENCE CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant R. Clayton
GRANT R CLAYTON CLAYTON, HOWARTH & CANNON PCPO BOX 1909SANDY, UT 84091-1909UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Real estate development services, namely, development of real estate time sharing projects, undivided deed interest clubs, private habitat clubs, right to use clubs, and long term lease projects | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |