USPTO serial 78524787
KINETEKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4204026Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2012
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, KAREN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KINETEKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. SHLESINGER
JAMES E. SHLESINGER SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY LLP5845 RICHMOND HWY STE 415ALEXANDRIA, VA 22303-1872UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic measuring apparatuses and instruments, namely, multifunctional sensors, wireless communication systems comprising wireless transmitters, wireless receivers and computer software for use therewith and computers for in situ use to measure pressure, torque, position and time and analyze such data; electronic navigation system and apparatus, namely, satellite navigational system, namely, a global positioning system for personal position measurement and logging; computer software for real time analysis of sensory data to provide weight transfer analysis, speed and acceleration calculations, caloric burn calculations, workout profiling, trajectory calculations, recommendations for movement and gait alterations for optimal performance injury and/or risk assessments, orthotics assessment and 3-D modeling; in situ sensors to provide movement and gait analysis comprising force pressure shoe inlay sensors, video cameras, satellite navigational system, namely, a global positioning system, wireless communication systems comprising wireless transmitters, wireless receivers and computer software for use therewith and accelerometers; electronic movement and gait performance testing machines in the nature of force and/or pressure inlay monitors, video cameras, wireless communication systems comprising wireless transmitters, wireless receivers and computer software for use therewith, satellite navigational system, namely, a global positioning system, accelerometers and operational software sold as a unit thereof | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |