CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for FUSION FORCE

USPTO serial 78524978

FUSION FORCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUSION FORCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dinesh Agarwal

DINESH AGARWAL LAW OFFICE DINESH AGARWAL PC5350 SHAWNEE RD STE 330ALEXANDRIA, VA 22312UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toys and games, namely, hand held unit for playing electronic games, playsets for action figures, toy vehicles and toy action figuresACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, production of children's television shows, animated cartoons and motion picturesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 2, 2005AMPBAMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance