Drawing for WINFUEL

USPTO serial 78525040

WINFUEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WINFUEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin C. Dailey

KEVIN C DAILEY GOEN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATIONLEGAL DEPT 8 RIDGEDALE AVECEDAR KNOLLS, NJ 07927UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Multivitamins, Dietary and Nutritional SupplementsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 21, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 21, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 21, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 7, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 6, 2005OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 28, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 8, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 23, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2005GNPEEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance