USPTO serial 78525143
TRICHOTHERAPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRICHOTHERAPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm J. Rich
Norm J. Rich FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K Street, N.W., Suite 500WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5143UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care preparations, namely, hair volumizer, hair shiner, curl activator, styling gel, hair spray,sun protection hair spray, and sun protection hair cream | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Anti-dandruff shampoo, cream and conditioner | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Hairbrushes and combs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Compilation of mailing lists; mail, on-line,telephone and electronic ordering services featuring goods and services for the care and treatment of the hair and scalp; direct mail advertising; advertising services, namely, dissemination of advertising materials relating to goods and services for the care and treatment of the hair and scalp; publicity services; marketing and promotional services, namely, arranging and conducting marketing and promotional events for the care and treatment of the hair and scalp; and advisory and consultancy services relating to the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kingsley, Philip
- Other trademarks owned by Kingsley, Philip
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named TRICHOTHERAPY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |