USPTO serial 78525252
LITTLE IDIOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LITTLE IDIOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph L. Serling
Joseph L. Serling Serling Rooks & Ferrara, LLP119 Fifth Avenue, 3rd FloorNew York, NY 10003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books and magazines in the field of music | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | T-shirts, sweatshirts, collared shirts, dress shirts, nightshirts, blouses, pants, shorts, hats, caps, sweatbands, socks, jackets, coats, sneakers, shoes, slippers, pajamas, scarves, gloves, underwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Nonalcoholic beverages with tea flavor | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Series of animated audio-visual programs for distribution and exhibition via television, motion pictures and the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Moby Entertainment Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Moby Entertainment Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LITTLE IDIOT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 3, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |