USPTO serial 78525256
DR. SUSAN TAYLOR'S RX FOR BROWN SKIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3518140Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 14, 2008
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DR. SUSAN TAYLOR'S RX FOR BROWN SKIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Krumenacher
Thomas J. Krumenacher Ryan Kromholz & Manion, S.C.P O Box 26618Milwaukee, WI 53226-0618UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, NORMAL TO DRY - HYDRATING FOAM SKIN CLEANSER; COSMETICS, NAMELY, NORMAL TO OILY - EXFOLIATING SKIN CLEANSER; COSMETICS, NAMELY, EXFOLIATING SKIN CLEANSER; NORMAL TO DRY - INTENSIVE MOISTURE SKIN CREAM; NORMAL TO OILY - MOISTURE SKIN LOTION; NORMAL TO DRY - INTENSIVE MOISTURE SKIN CREAM SPF 15; NORMAL TO OILY - MOISTURE SKIN LOTION SPF 15; SKIN TONER - FOR ALL SKIN TYPES; EXFOLIATING CLEANSER; INTENSIVE SPOT TREATMENT, NAMELY, HYPER-PIGMENTATION SPOT REDUCING CREAM; BOTANICAL SKIN EVENING CREAM; PURIFYING GEL SKIN CLEANSER; NATURAL STICKY MASK, NAMELY, SKIN MASK; RETEXTURIZING BOOSTER SERUMS, NAMELY BEAUTY SERUMS; FULLY RESTORED MULTI-MINERAL TREATMENT, NAMELY NON-MEDICATED SKIN CREAM FOR USE IN SMOOTHING THE SKIN | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Taylor, Susan Dr.
- Other trademarks owned by Taylor, Susan Dr.
- Other trademarks owned by Taylor, Susan Dr.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named DR. SUSAN TAYLOR'S RX FOR BROWN SKIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |