USPTO serial 78525522
FLO JO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLO JO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear
JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-7216UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PAPER AND PAPER ARTICLES; NAMELY, TRADING CARDS; STATIONERY; PAPER DIE CUT SHAPES; GIFT WRAP; PAPER PARTY GOODS, NAMELY, PAPER PARTY HATS, PAPER CAKE DECORATIONS AND PAPER TABLE CLOTHS; PICTURES, POSTERS, MOUNTED AND UNMOUNTED PHOTOGRAPHS; PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BOOKS, MAGAZINES, NEWSLETTERS, AND BULLETINS ABOUT SPORTS AND SPORTS FIGURES; ADDRESS BOOKS; PHOTO AND STAMP ALBUMS; PAPER BANNERS; COMIC BOOKS, AND NEWSPAPER COMIC STRIPS; CARTOONS STRIPS AND CARTOON BOOKS; COLORING BOOKS AND CHILDREN'S BOOKS; BULLETIN BOARDS; CALENDARS; PENS AND PENCILS; PEN AND PENCIL CASES; ERASERS; MARKERS; CRAYONS; CHALK; ARTS AND CRAFTS PAINT KITS; GREETING, NOTE, BLANK AND PLAYING CARDS; WRITING AND NOTE PAPER AND PADS; NOTEBOOKS; BOOK COVERS; EDUCATIONAL PICTURE BOOKS; DECALS; DESK SETS AND DESK ORGANIZERS; PAPER NAPKINS; BATHROOM AND FACIAL TISSUE; TISSUE PAPER; PAPER PLACE MATS; AND RUBBER STAMPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | all purpose sport bags; athletic bags; gym bags; luggage; wallets; hand bags; shoulder bags; back packs; knap sacks; fanny packs; tote bags; carry-on bags; duffel bags; key cases; and umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SHIRTS, TOPS WITH LONG AND SHORT SLEEVES, SLEEVELESS SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, SWEAT TOPS, SWEAT PANTS, TIGHTS, JACKETS, COATS, SWIMWEAR, SHORTS, BOARD SHORTS, PANTS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, UNDERWEAR, SOCKS, VESTS, BELTS, HEADWEAR, FOOTWEAR AND UNIFORMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 19, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |