USPTO serial 78525879
SANIBLANC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2008
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SANIBLANC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
S.A. Lhoist Recherche et Developpement en abrégé L.R.D.
Ottignies-LouvaIn-la-Neuve, BE
Other trademarks owned by S.A. Lhoist Recherche et Developpement en abrégé L.R.D.
S.A. Lhoist Recherche et Developpement en abrégé L.R.D.
Ottignies-LouvaIn-la-Neuve, BE
Other trademarks owned by S.A. Lhoist Recherche et Developpement en abrégé L.R.D.
S.A. Lhoist Recherche et Developpement en abrégé L.R.D.
Ottignies-LouvaIn-la-Neuve, BE
Other trademarks owned by S.A. Lhoist Recherche et Developpement en abrégé L.R.D.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
DOUGLAS R WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in industry, agriculture, horticulture and forestry, namely, liquid and solid calcic and/or magnesian products used for the sanitation and hygienisation of livestock buildings and litters, namely, calcium oxide, magnesium oxide, dolomitic lime, calcium hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide, dolomitic hydrated lime, halfburnt dolomite and milk of lime; manures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Agricultural services, namely, contract farming services and horticultural services, vermin exterminating for agriculture, horticulture and forestry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by S.A. Lhoist Recherche et Developpement en abrégé L.R.D.
- Other trademarks owned by S.A. Lhoist Recherche et Developpement en abrégé L.R.D.
- Other trademarks owned by S.A. Lhoist Recherche et Developpement en abrégé L.R.D.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named SANIBLANC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PBIU | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB-ITU REQUEST | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |