USPTO serial 78526292
RED APPLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAN, REBECCAH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RED APPLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | ARM CHAIRS; BABY BOLSTERS; BEDS; BED FRAMES; BENCHES; BOOK CABINETS; BOOK STANDS; BOOK CASES; BOOSTER SEATS; CABINETS; CHAIRS; CHESTS OF DRAWERS COAT HANGERS; COAT STANDS; COMPUTER TROLLEY; COUCHES; COUNTER TOPS; CUPBOARDS; CUSHIONS; DESKS; DINING TALES DISPLAY CABINETS; DISPLAY CASES; DOORS FOR FURNITURE; DRESSING TABLES; FILING CABINETS; FLOWER STANDS; FOOTSTOOLS; FURNITURE; FURNITURE CADDIES; FURNITURE CHESTS; FURNITURE FRAMES; FURNITURE PARTITIONS; FURNITURE PARTS; HONEY COMBS; KITCHEN CABINETS; LOVE SEATS; MAGAZINE RACKS; MATTRESS CUSHIONS; MATTRESS FOUNDATIONS; MATTRESS TOPPERS; MATTRESSES; MEDICINE CABINETS; MIRRORS; MON-MEDICAL AIR MATTRESSES; NON-MEDICAL AIR PILLOWS; NON-METAL BOXES; NON-METAL HOOKS; NON-METAL LADDERS; OFFICE FURNITURE; PEDESTALS; PICTURE FRAMES; PILLOWS; PLASTIC BOXES; PLASTIC CASES; RATTAN; SCHOOL FURNITURE; SERVING TROLLEYS; SHELVES; SHOE CABINETS; SIDEBOARDS; SOFAS; SOFT SCULPTURE WALL DECORATIONS; STOOLS; STORAGE RACKS; TABLES; TEA CARTS; TEA TABLES; TEA TROLLEYS; TELEVISION CABINETS; UMBRELLA STANDS; VANITIES;WALL CABINETS; WARDROBES; WOOD BOXES; WOOD CASES; WORK BENCHES | ACTIVE | Jan 21, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |