USPTO serial 78526520
JOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. Bartz, Richard O. Bartz
Richard J. Bartz, Richard O. Bartz Bartz & Bartz, P.A.6950 France Ave. S., Ste. 119Edina, MN 55435UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Protective athletic garments, namely, men's hockey shorts with cup pouches and sock clips, men's hockey pants with cup pouches, goalie hockey compression shorts with cup pouches, sups and socks holders, women's hockey shorts with pelvic protectors and sock holders, with cup pouches and straps, men's briefs with cup pouches, men's compression shorts with protective cups, men's compression shorts with adjustable protection cups, men's shorts with contour cup pouches, and men's pants with built-in cup pouches | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |