USPTO serial 78526665
PROTECTIONBLOG.NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROTECTIONBLOG.NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas W. Kenyon, Esq.
DOUGLAS W KENYON ESQ HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 109RALEIGH, NC 27602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | provide consumer information about new products and technology advancements in the field of online protection | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | e-mail communications with experts regarding specific protection issues | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | providing a website whereby Internet users can go to learn about staying protected online, including information about online annoyances, namely, the latest worms, phishers, viruses and trojan horses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |