Drawing for T-MOBILE M2M CONNECT

USPTO serial 78526938

T-MOBILE M2M CONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3028808Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 13, 2005
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with T-MOBILE M2M CONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Adams

MICHAEL D. ADAMS MAYER BROWN LLP71 SOUTH WACKER DRIVECHICAGO, IL 60606-4637UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042[ computer programming services for others; rental of computer software and hardware for online access; data encryption services; application service provider, namely, hosting computer software applications for others, hosting of digital content on the internet; hosting the websites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; computer services, namely, creating indexes of information available on computer networks; providing information via the telephone and the global communication networks in the field of information technology; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; technical project planning services related to telecommunications equipment; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable telecommunications software for providing multiple user access to the global computer network; providing information at the specific request of end-users by means of telephone or global communications networks ]SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2012C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
May 31, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 15, 2012C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
May 15, 2012ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 20, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2005CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Jun 24, 2005CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance