USPTO serial 78527117
TANGERINE KITCHEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TANGERINE KITCHEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARVIN L. UNION
MICHAEL A BONDI PATTERSON THUENTE SKAAR & CHRISTENSEN80 SOUTH 8TH ST4800 IDS CENTERMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2100Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | HAND OPERATED IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY, SOAP DISPENSERS, SALAD SPINNERS, BLENDERS, AND GRATERS, CUTLERY, NAMELY, FORKS, SPOONS, KNIVES, LADLES, SPAGHETTI SERVERS, ICE CREAM SCOOPS, ICE CREAM SPADES, KITCHEN SHEARS, PEELERS, SCOOP COLANDERS, PIE SERVERS, FOIL CUTTERS, STIR STICKS, AND MELON BALLERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | HOUSEHOLD AND KITCHEN UTENSILS, NAMELY, SCRAPERS, ROLLING PINS, SPATULAS, TURNERS, WHISKS, STRAINERS, POTATO MASHERS, TONGS, SKIMMERS, MEASURERS, BASTERS, SPAOONLA, BOTTLE OPENERS, CAN OPENERS, GRATERS, CORKSCREWS, SIFTERS, GARLIC PRESSES, PIZZA ROLLERS, PIZZA CUTTERS, LOBSTER CRACKERS, NUT CRACKERS, OIL SPRAYERS, VEGETABLE STEAMERS, BOTTLE STOPPERS, COASTER, CUZZLES, ICE BUCKETS, FLASKS, WINE TAGS, SHAKERS, WINE CHILLERS, WINE POURERS, THERMOMETERS, COLANDERS, CORERS, BAG SEALERS, BAGEL SLICERS, CUTTERS, CHIP CLIPS, EGG SLICERS, FOOD CHOPPERS, JUICERS, REAMERS, MEAT TENDERIZERS, MEZZALUNA, PASTRY BRUSHES, SCALES, SPOON RESTS, TIMERS, TRIVETS, BBQ SAUCE SETS, BBQ MOPS, BBQ BRUSHES, FLIPPERS, SKEWERS, GRILL BASKETS, STRAW DISPENSERS, FRUIT BASKETS, DISH RACKS, CUTLERY ORGANIZERS, DRAIN BOARDS, NAPKIN HOLDERS, TOWEL HOLDERS, HOT PADS, CUTTING BOARDS, COOKIE CUTTERS, COOKIE PRESSES, EGG POACHERS, BACON RACKS, HOT DOG COOKERS, STEAMERS, ALL PURPOSE PORTABLE HOUSEHOLD CONTAINERS; ARTICLES FOR CLEANING PURPOSES AND GLASSWARE, NAMELY, BOWLS, JIGGERS, DISHES, MUGS, CANISTERS, THERMOSES, BAKING PANS, STORAGE CONTAINERS, MORTER AND PESTEL, SOAP DISPENSERS, TRASH CANS, ICE CUBE TRAYS, SCRUBBING AND WASHING BROOMS, BUCKETS, SCRUBBERS, DUST PAINS, BRUSHES, MOPS, SQUEEGEES, BRUSH HOLDERS, AND SPONGES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |