USPTO serial 78527294
FATBUZZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FATBUZZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda M. Goldman
LINDA M GOLDMAN WHITE, REDWAY & BROWN LLP151 ELSIE STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, hats, sweaters, jackets, pants, shorts, shoes, socks, sweatshirts, and other goods in class 25 | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Computerized online ordering featuring general merchandise and general consumer goods; advertising and commercial information services, via the Internet; providing and rental of advertising space on the Internet; dissemination of advertising for others via the Internet; promoting the goods and services of others by means of operating an on-line shopping mall with links to the retail web sites of others; providing an online commercial information directory on the Internet; on-line retail store services featuring clothing and other goods; advertising by transmission of online publicity for third parties through electronic communications networks; providing a searchable online advertising guide featuring the goods and services of other online vendors on the Internet; providing on-line directory information services also featuring hyperlinks to other web sites; and other services in Class 35 | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing e-mail services; communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; streaming of audio material on the Internet; streaming of video material on the Internet; providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest; providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users; providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer users; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users; and other services in Class 38 | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, filtering of unwanted e-mails; hosting of digital content on the Internet; design, creation, hosting and maintenance of internet sites for third parties; and other services in class 42 | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Christopher A. Comella
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FATBUZZ
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |