Drawing for DEAN & REED'S DIAMOND SERIES

USPTO serial 78527669

DEAN & REED'S DIAMOND SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DEAN & REED'S DIAMOND SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL L BOOTS

DANIEL L BOOTS BINGHAM MCHALE LLP2700 MARKET TWR 10 W MARKET STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Action figures and modeled plastic toy figurinesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 10, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 10, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 29, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 11, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 13, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 13, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance