Drawing for CRACKDOWN

USPTO serial 78527933

CRACKDOWN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DINALLO, KEVIN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRACKDOWN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William O. Ferron, Jr.

William O. Ferron, Jr. Seed IP Law Group PLLC701 Fifth AvenueSuite 5400Seattle, WA 98104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009prerecorded videotapes, audio tapes, CDs and DVDs featuring sound and video in the fields of music, live action programs, motion pictures and animated cartoons; motion picture films featuring comedy, drama, action, adventure and animation; motion picture films for broadcast on television featuring comedy, drama, action, adventure and animation; covers for computer game consoles for use with televisions or computers; and covers for computer game peripherals for use with televisions or computers, namely, game controller coversACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 14, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 28, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 23, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 12, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance