Drawing for HOMEBUILDING BEST PRACTICES

USPTO serial 78528530

HOMEBUILDING BEST PRACTICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOMEBUILDING BEST PRACTICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM H LOGSDON

WILLIAM H LOGSDON WEBB ZIESENHEIM LOGSDON ORKIN & HANSON700 KOPPERS BLDG436 7TH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1818

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041television programs and production of television programs relating to design engineering, troubleshooting, research and quality assessment in the field of residential constructionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 15, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 14, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 8, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 4, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Oct 4, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 22, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 21, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 23, 2006CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Feb 23, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance