USPTO serial 78528562
SUPERSOFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPERSOFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beth M. Goldman
BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing and footwear for children and infants, namely, athletic shoes, athletic sports suits, baby bibs not of paper, baby pants, belts, blouses, body suits, booties, cardigans, caps, cloth diapers, coats, diaper pants, dresses, exercise suits, footwear, gloves, gowns, gym suits, hats, infant one piece underwear and outerwear, jackets, jeans, jogging suits, jumpers, leggings, leotards, lingerie, loungewear, mittens, overalls, pants, polo shirts, robes, sacks for infants, sandals, shirts, shoes, shorts, skirts, sleepwear, slippers, smocks, sneakers, snowsuits, socks, sport shirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, swimwear, T-shirts, tights, underwear, warm-up suits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2006 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |