USPTO serial 78528608
RLX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RLX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Roxanne Elings
SCOTT GELIN GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP200 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry, namely, chains, medallions, charms, rings, amulets, brooches, bracelets, ornamental pins, necklaces, belt buckles of precious metals, precious stones, beads for jewelry, pearls, earrings, ear clips, cuff links, pendants, costume jewelry, wedding bands, money clips of precious metal, jewelry boxes, cases and caskets of precious metal; horological and chronometric instruments, namely, mechanical and automatic watches, wrist watches, diving watches, stop watches, pocket watches, watch fobs, jewelry watches; horological and chronometric fittings namely, parts, faces, movements, casings, crowns, bands, straps, pouches, boxes, clasps, winders, winding buttons, dials, chains, cases, straps made of metal, leather and plastic | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |