Drawing for PFG PLAY FOR GOD

USPTO serial 78528624

PFG PLAY FOR GOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PFG PLAY FOR GOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy F. Divino

AMY F DIVINO STEINBERG & RASKIN PC1140 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 15NEW YORK, NY 10036-5803UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025athletic shoes of all types, head wearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 24, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 24, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 15, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 13, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2004COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance