USPTO serial 78529108
STANLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STANLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Davis, II
James R. Davis, II Arent Fox LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20036-5399UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toy hand tools, toy power operated tools; toy lawn and garden hand tools, toy lawn and garden power operated tools; toy workbenches sold with and without power operated and mechanical features and sold with and without toy tools and other accessories; toy auto mechanic play sets, toy power operated air drill with play car; construction dress-up play sets sold with and without toy tools and toy ornamental safety products, namely, toy safety glasses, toy hard-hats, and toy work gloves; toy soft tools for preschool age children in soft rounded fabric shapes with and without light and sound features; toy soft tool kits, dress-up role play kits that include toy soft tools, toy tool belt, toy hard hat, and toy accessories consistent with construction theme; play kits incorporating wood pieces with pre-drilled holes, screws and foam, plastic, paper, and metal that require assembly with toy metal, wood or plastic miniature replicas of hand tools; toy nontoxic paints and brushes; toy replicas of hand tools, toy tool kits and toy toolboxes; wood hobby craft kits for building toy furniture and toy play sets containing toy replicas of hand tools, toy toolboxes, and toy furniture kit pieces; hobby craft kits for making birdhouses, bird feeders, butterfly houses, doll houses, letter boxes, clocks, radios, metal detectors, keepsake boxes, mini-frames, decorative lawn signs, house number plaques, tissue box holders, and for making door welcome signs; hobby craft kits for making toy trucks, cars, planes, boats, and dinosaurs; hobby craft kits for making lamps, wall growth charts, shelves, stools, chairs, mirrors, clothes racks, coat racks, toy chests, and for making table clocks; toy pet food and water bowls for toy pet houses; hobby craft kits for making wooden signs featuring a heated stylus for burning wood; toy non-wood activities kits that incorporate construction themes and employ the use of wood, metal or plastic toy miniatures of hand tools; toy dough and compound sets that include hand tools for cutting, shaping, and sculpting; toy masonry kits, incorporating molds to cast realistic toy mini bricks or finished mini bricks mortar, and toy masonry trowels; toy mosaic tile sets incorporating toy ceramic glazed tiles, grout, and toy trowels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stanley Logistics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Stanley Logistics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by STANLEY LOGISTICS, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named STANLEY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |