Drawing for SOULEIADO HOME

USPTO serial 78529279

SOULEIADO HOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOULEIADO HOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell Rader Fishman & Grauer PLLC39533 Woodward AvenueSuite 140Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Luminaries, lamps, electric torcheres, suspension pendants for lights, wall lampsACTIVE—
016articles for decoration, namely, murals, lithographs, engravings, paintings, and framed works of art, namely, pictures, photographs, etchings, chromos, lithographies, art pictures, picture post cards, watercolor picturesACTIVE—
020Furniture for house and gardenACTIVE—
021non-electric torcheresACTIVE—
024printed fabrics and woven fabrics for use in clothing, home furniture, and decorationACTIVE—
027CarpetsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 13, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 16, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 9, 2007FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Apr 2, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 2, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 20, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance