USPTO serial 78529472
RECONNEX ICONTROLLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RECONNEX ICONTROLLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dax Alvarez
DAX ALVAREZ BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP7TH FL12400 WILSHIRE BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer software that provides firewall and gateway protection, content filtering, detection and alert of intruders attempting to defeat, circumvent or otherwise compromise the security of a network and virus protection; communications software and computer networking software; computer anti-virus software; enterprise security software for use in detecting breaches in content security policies or inappropriate use of the enterprise networking resources; internal and external vulnerability management computer hardware; computer soft ware for managing the internal and external vulnerability of computer networks; integrated computer network security system comprising computer hardware and computer software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer security services, namely, firewall, gateway and intrusion detection services, namely, installation of computer software for others in the field of computer network security; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; computer consultation services in the field of computer network security | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Monitoring of computer network systems for security purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reconnex Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Reconnex Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named RECONNEX ICONTROLLER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |