Drawing for ANVIL

USPTO serial 78530007

ANVIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANVIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Toby H. Kusmer

ROBERT M OCONNELL JR GOODWIN PROCTER LLPEXCHANGE PL 53 STATE STATTN TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORBOSTON, MA 02109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Software solution support services, namely providing technical support to informational technology personnel and users with regard to the implementing and use of application software used in the food industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 2, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 13, 2006LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jan 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance