USPTO serial 78530407
TRIPLE DOUBLE GOLD LEAF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRIPLE DOUBLE GOLD LEAF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Reno, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sana Hakim, Esq.
SANA HAKIM ESQ BELL, BOYD & LLOYD LLCPO BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Gaming machines, namely, devices which accept a wager and components therefor, namely, controllers, displays, button panels, bolsters, electrical wiring, and computer hardware and software associated therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |